Archive for July, 2009

An apology to my present self from the former

NS July 31st, 2009

In reading this post at J. Lucy Muses about how she reacted when her toddler son ran away from her in the public library, I saw myself. Been there, done that, I thought. Hell, still doing it, on a regular basis. I’ve been that irate and embarrassed mother who couldn’t “control” her child, getting sneers of disapproval from onlookers.

I’ve also been that shithead onlooker, though. There was a period of a few years, before I had kids (obviously), where I was one of those people who thought “Ugh, how rude! I cannot BELIEVE that this person is letting their filthy brat run around screaming. What a monster! Kids should not be allowed in here, they should be at a playground or at home or in school and that’s it. Good day and good riddance!”

When I waited tables I dreaded getting families with small children because I knew that they’d make a huge mess, the parents would expect me to fawn over their offspring, they wouldn’t drink (racking up a big bar bill is important for good tips) and would probably leave me a bunch of coins and some french fries as a tip. I wasn’t rude to them or anything, I always provided service with a smile (Jesus, I hated that job) but if one of them stepped one toe out of line…that was it, I was finished. I had no patience for kids, especially ones I thought were being “bad.”

If I could go back in a time machine and kick the everliving shit out of myself for being such an ignorant, insensitive, uncaring, arrogant JERK, I would use the brass knuckles on myself until I looked like Shane MacGowan after a night on the tiles. I would apologise to all the mothers whom I shot dirty looks at, all the fathers I rolled my eyes at when they beamed with pride at some inane thing their brat-beast had just said or done, all of the under-the-breath muttered comments when a child so much as talked in a coffee shop. I would take a good, hard look at myself and realise that the reason I was so het up about kids is because I felt conflicted about them. I rejected the idea of modern, stifling, hovering, advertised, groomed and perfected parenting with every fibre of my being. I knew that if I became like THEM, those pod parents, I would shrivel up and die and be a mere shell of my former self.

Yet, I knew I wanted them. This made my angry. I didn’t want to become a pod person, with a pod beast!

I had no idea there was any other way to parent. I didn’t know I could still go out and have a good time, that I could still drink some wine while pregnant and breastfeeding, that I wouldn’t lose the ability to speak in sentences without using baby talk, that I didn’t have to start calling my partner ‘Daddy’ even when the kids weren’t around.

I didn’t know that I didn’t have to be a complete douchebag to be a parent. I also didn’t realise just how hard it is. “Controlling” a child is a completely laughable and utterly stupid expression. I should no more assume I can control my child than I can control my husband, or him me. Children are people, fully fledged human beings with feelings, thoughts and impulses and they are LEARNING. They are learning and exploring and testing and growing and we should be there just to make sure they don’t kill themselves or someone else in the process. When’s the last time mass chaos, murder and mayhem erupted from an incidence of running in a library for three minutes? Where is the erosion of society’s moral fabric in something so demonic as singing loudly in a grocery store? Isn’t it silly, all these expecations and pressure we place not only on parents to control but on children, to be controllable?

So, Former Self, get off your high-horse, you impetuous, stupid, arrogant girl. And next time you see a kid running in public, his mother charging around behind trying to “control” the situation while you stare and tut, give yourself a punch in the face and then get up off your imperious ass and go give her a hand. At the very least, stick a leg out so the kid trips and she can catch him.

Hey, it takes a village, right?

Stick to the mall, sweetheart

NS July 27th, 2009

[Warning: This is a vent about some crap said about certain happenings and goings-on at BlogHer, and I wasn't even there. If that pisses you off, or if you're totally uninterested, look away. I'm just a rantin']

Unless you’ve been under a rock (i.e. aren’t on Twitter), you’ll know that this past weekend was the BlogHer conference in Chicago, an annual event where female bloggers (and a few dudes!) from across the globe come together to explore issues relating to that funny little thing we call the blogosphere. People agonised over what to wear, who to room with and which parties to go to. To be honest, I was sick of hearing about BlogHer from the excited participants before it began and I wasn’t even attending! That’s more to do with my curmudgeonliness than anything else, and perhaps a pinch of jealousy, but when one’s Twitter stream is filled up with news of it for days, it can get a bit old.

Anyway, from what I gathered through reading others’ accounts, it’s kind of like a combination sorority function/business luncheon, with everyone broken into “tribes” to network and party with like-minded folks. There are tears, laughs, arguments, drunken escapades, inspiring speeches…and an endless array of free crap from the companies sponsoring it. These freebies are called ’swag’ and apparently many of those at BlogHer were acting like flesh-eating zombies who don’t mind throwing an elbow or baring teeth to get to their prey…the free shit.
Particularly greedy in their swag-lust were the mommy bloggers, according to attendee Motherhood Uncensored in her post entitled “Not all bloggers are like that.” Many of the commenters agreed with her: mommy blogging has become very ugly indeed, and those who aren’t money-hungry soul-suckers would be best to avoid that label until Respect and Decency are brought back to the mommy blogosphere. They all applauded the introduction of a concept called “Blogging with Integrity” that was heralded at the conference and encouraged one another to embrace it to counteract the crazy swag-snatching whores.

Now, I realise that it must’ve been annoying, even infuriating, to be run over by these bloggers’ lust for more stuff, and that it is frustrating to see blogging turned into one big circle jerk of self-promotion (because I hate it too, I really do), but I get annoyed when I read stuff like this because guess what? Just because we’re all bloggers and mothers doesn’t mean we all operate under the same “rules of engagement” as one commenter suggested, nor do we have the same desires and goals. It certainly doesn’t mean we have to tow the line in deference to some kind of pack mentality that says what each of us does, we all do; what each of us says, we all say. Bullshit! It’s thinking like that that strips away womens’ individuality and makes us all part of some pseudo “team” that we’re each supposed to morally conform to and represent. Just like ’sluts’ in the 50s and 60s who gave all women everywhere a bad name with their loose ways (ahem) and the feminist career women of the 70s and 80s who were an affront to “regular women” (ha!), bundling us all together and taking individual actions as indicative of an entire gender’s motives is not really progressive, or inclusive of differences among us. We are already constantly pressured to be bastions of morality, warned that if we fall outside of what makes us look good as a whole, our integrity, reputations and self-respect as individuals are at stake; not least of all with other women. It’s very similar to arguments for “female purity” by virginity-preserving crusaders, funnily enough.

One commenter on this post emphasized this by saying: “Your actions reflect on all of us,” in reference to not only the consumer-crazed women but a blogger named Esther who tried to bring her nursing baby into an evening cocktail party thrown by Nikon and then, when she was turned away, vented her frustration on Twitter with a tongue-in-cheek #nikonhatesbabies tag. This was viewed nearly as contemptuously as the gift-grabbers. The entitlement! The gall! The humanity!

Considering the fact that the baby was nursing and Esther was presumably not a Chicagoan with childcare right around the corner, what choice did she have except to go with her baby or miss out? She was remiss in not checking beforehand and says so herself in the comments section, but she figured a babe-in-arms dependent on her for nutrition and unable to run around or destroy anything AT A WOMEN’S EVENT would be okay — it may be poor social etiquette, given our disdain for children in adult spaces (and I do think there are some lines to be drawn, though not nearly as many as currently exist) but is it really so horrifying? And if so, what does that say about how we segregate adults from chlidren and, subsequently, mothers from the general public, particularly those who are breastfeeding? They are particularly affected by these lines in the sand about where is and is not an acceptable place to bring a baby because for them it is not as simple as “Get a babysitter,” the expression always thrown around in these types of conversation.

Class privilege in assuming one can afford and locate an out-of-town babysitter aside, Esther’s only ‘crime’ was thinking she could mix parenting with having fun and networking. From what I’ve read, she was initially (and understandably) disappointed that she didn’t get to go but she wasn’t asking for special treatment, she just made an honest mistake in thinking that her baby would be welcome there. But even though Esther had already expressed misgivings for her mistake and said that she had talked to Nikon and all had been smoothed over, the disparaging comments still came rolling in.

“Some mommy bloggers are so self righteous.”

“[I] cringed every time I read a blog post this weekend where bloggers said about taking children seemingly with no sitter of some sort in tow. It’s a blogger convention, not Sesame Street.”

“It’s pretty shocking that anyone thinks that it is okay to take a baby to a cocktail party.”

“Why would you bring a baby to a loud party, anyway? With alcohol, and candles, and so many people, and loud music and voices, and people smoking? [What sordid things could a baby do with alcohol and candles, pray tell? Unless you're saying mothers can't be trusted to drink responsibily around their children? And it's illegal to smoke indoors in Chicago, so that wouldn't have been an issue at all]Give me a break.”

“A private party is not the mall.”

So breastfeeding women (and anyone who can’t afford or find a babysitter) should just stick to Sesame Street and the mall while the more glamorous ladies with nannies get drunk on daiquiris and congratulate themselves on “thinking ahead” (i.e. being middle class and not being restricted by a nursing infant’s needs or their incomes)? Okay, got it.

And if THAT is what constitutes good “mommy blogging” these days, I want no part of it either.

War, as viewed from a canoe

NS July 23rd, 2009

Have you ever accidentally witnessed something so achingly beautiful and touching that it haunts your dreams? Have you ever felt honoured to simply have been there when someone else did something so small but so raw that you could almost feel their pain, or joy, or grief?

In the summer of 2001, The Noble Husband and I went on a week-long holiday to Dubrovnik, Croatia. Situated on a stunning piece of coast of the Adriatic Sea, Croatia was just becoming a more popular tourist destination after the Bosnian-Croatian-Serbian wars that raged throughout the 90s. We spent a relaxing few days in a small town across the bay from the main city, clocking in a lot of time on the beach or reading under the shady trees and dining together in the evenings.

We decided to do a day trip that we saw advertised at the hotel we were staying in. It involved taking a coach on a scenic route through Croatia, over the border into Bosnia and then canoeing down a river. Up for some adventure and fresh air, we eagerly signed up.

During the coach ride I remember the tour guide telling us a bit more about the war and what it had done to the area and its people. She said tourism was increasing now and things were being rebuilt but that the people hadn’t recovered yet. Hardly surprising, given the genocide and mass rape campaigns that took place. The mood on the coach was somber as we crossed over the border.

Along the roadside we began to see piles of rocks, some with white crosses perched atop them. Wilted flowers lay alongside many of these rock piles. The tour guide explained that these marked spots where local people and solidiers had been slain. One crumbling pile of stones was anchored by a ratty, worn teddy bear with a deflated red balloon tied to its neck. Even it had no motivation to float.

Once we were past the checkpoints and before we headed down to the river, we stopped in a small village to refuel and stretch our legs. We were warned not to go into any local bars and to stick to the shop attached to the petrol station, where the meagre few tourists were catered for. I imagined big, dusty men whose eyes had seen horrors humans should never witness sweating into their beers and simultaneously being encouraged and disgusted by the tourists outside, ready to go on a boat tour of their misery.

I paddled half-heartedly once we were in the river and discovered that I was not a natural canoeist. TNH and I spent a lot of time tangled up in trees alongside the riverbank, swearing and arguing while trying to take in the “scenery.” The land is beautiful, no doubt, but seeing entire families living in one room houses held together with a few nails and a prayer, washing clothes in the river and picking berries, didn’t feel scenic to me. It made me incredibly sad instead.

At one point the guide told us that there was a waterfall coming up, one that we would be going over (it wasn’t a very large drop). He said that the local children would undoubtedly be there, waiting to see if we had anything to offer. He came round to each canoe and gave us a couple fistfuls of candy each. I looked down at the metallic wrappers glinting in my blistered and splintered hands and couldn’t decide whether to laugh or cry. I felt like such an interloper, a fraud. What the hell was I doing on VACATION in this place? Why hadn’t I paid more attention to the world when this war was going on? The extraordinay privilege of my upbringing and geographical location hit me square between the eyes. And boy, did it sting.

As we approached the waterfall, I saw a few dark heads bob into sight and heard the unmistakable sound of children shouting. I have no idea what they were saying but they ran alongside us with their arms outstretched, laughing and calling out as the slightly wet candy rained down on them, the afternoon sun capturing perfectly their innocence. I wanted to jump out of my canoe and swim to them, take them in my arms and promise them the moon and stars. Instead, I gave them all I had to show that I cared: a smile and reciprocated laughter.

Their mothers watched from the shore, hands shielding their eyes from the glare as they balanced laundry baskets and babies on their hips. Their eyes did not smile. What use would candy be to them, or their children after it had been gobbled up? The world as they knew it had been eaten alive and left empty; shiny wrappers couldn’t fool them.

After the canoe trip had finished and we’d had lunch on the bank, we were allowed to explore the area we now found ourselves in. Most of the people we had come with opted to sit in the shade and drink beer after buying souvenirs from the gift shop. We were told there were some ruins to explore, and a salt flat. We had a quick look at the latter and then started the hike up to the top of the large, tree-covered hill to see what we could see. We took in the view, read some plaques and after a few pictures and some somber reflection, started to make our way down.

TNH had gone ahead to have a look at something that had caught his eye but I stood looking at the bombed, crumbling, centuries-old cathedral and imagined what it had seen in all the years it had withstood mankind’s hypocrisy; building and creating and nurturing things but then knocking them down and strangling the life out of them, again and again. I ran my hand along the rough edges of the wall and rubbed the grit between my palms. I swore to myself that I would never forget these people, this tragedy, this place. It was the beginning of my political awakening, my awareness of and sympathy to human suffering and my anger and indignation toward those who perpetrate it.

It would lead me to study international relations and European politics when I return to university the following winter. It would lead to my interest in NGO aid for women, as I searched for ways I could help, in some tiny way, the tens of thousdands of girls and women who had been systemically raped and used as pawns of war. This, in turn, would lead to my invigorated interest in feminism, something I am absolutely 100% passionate about today. So to say that this holiday had an effect on me is to say the very, very least.

But that isn’t the haunting, beautiful moment I was speaking of in the beginning of this post. None of that was about me, I was merely having a privilege epiphany on a forest-laden hill. No, the real moment occured when, as I stood there with my thoughts and emotions bashing into one another inside my head, I heard something coming from inside the cathedral’s walls. It was music! I strained to make out where it was coming from and tried peering into some of the charred holes left in the battered brick, but all I saw was rubble. I circled around to the other side and noticed a door slightly ajar. A heavy rock prevented it from closing and revealed a gap just wide enough for my face.

At the front of the cathedral, before the altar and at a piano covered in a thick layer of dust and sorrow, sat a raven-haired woman with her back arched over the instrument, her feet pumping the pedals and her fingers flying over the ivory keys. She played alternately softly, then angrily, but always speedily. Something about it was urgent and so raw, like her fingers couldn’t keep up with her heart.

She wore a plain brown dress and her hair was tied into a tight bun. A strand of it escaped and loitered lazily on her forehead, pressed there by the heat of the sun and her emotions. She didn’t notice my presence and I didn’t dare breathe. I knew I should leave her to her moment, all alone, but I felt rooted to the spot. I thought, this is what it must be like to witness a miracle, or a child being born, or a person taking their last breath: you don’t feel worthy of being there, just so grateful that you are.

When the song ended, the woman stood up, looked down at the piano for several moments and then genuflected before the cross. Then she sat back down on the bench, closed the piano’s lid and lay her head on it.

At that point, I left. To keep watching felt too much like an invasion of privacy, even though she must’ve known that there were tourists rooting around up there. She was so oblivious to anyone and anything else that I doubt she’d have even noticed. I still wonder who she was playing that song for. A murdered husband? A lost child? A sister who will never be the same after enduring unspeakable horrors? God? Or maybe it was a song for us, the tourists come to view her pain. Perhaps unable to speak English or knowing she’d be punished in some form if she tried to speak to us about what happened there, her only way to communicate with us may have been through music. Softly explaining how life was before it ended, and then angrily asking us how we let it happen, and why.

I’ll never know how war happens. I’ll never know why. But I know that I will always hate it and fight it and wish to banish it. And if ever I should doubt why peace matters, I will reach into my memory bank and call forth the raven-haired woman who bared her soul amongst the rubble of our undoing.

Not ‘best,’ just normal

NS July 21st, 2009

In the last 24 hours, two major UK newspapers (The Times and the Daily Mail) have run articles questioning, decrying and even outright criticising breastfeeding as the ‘best’ method for feeding an infant. The tagline on the Times article reads: “Mothers are constantly urged to breastfeed yet there is little evidence to suggest that it is better than formula milk.”

How odd that sounds, I thought. Why is the onus on breastmilk to prove itself better than the artificial alternative? Shouldn’t it be the other way around? Where are the studies holding breastfeeding up as the norm and challenging formula to prove itself just as nutritious, safe and healthy for babies and mothers? I imagine they don’t exist because they can’t prove these things. Besides which, who is going to sponsor and undertake a study on whether or not an artificial means of feeding ourselves is better than just ingesting readily available food meant for our digestive systems? And if artificial food did become a necessity, wouldn’t we want to make it as close as possible to real food while finding ways to make real food more easily accessible? Doing it the other way round just doesn’t make sense to me.

Still, culture is a powerful thing and scientists (and the companies funding them) are not immune to its lures and demands. So they see the public voicing concerns on subjects relating to health and they look for news ways in which they can refute or justify certain claims. The problem is, they often disregard whether the claim is actually a scientifically worthy one. Should studies be done on how we can make formula safer and more like breastmilk? Absolutely. But in controlling for the experiments involved in that research, breastfeeding must be held as the norm, the control group, the standard, not the other way around. Breastmilk is the yardstick against which other infant feeding methods should be measured, not forced to prove itself against its artificial alternatives or denigrated as some kind of ’special bonus’ thing you can do if you want to be extra healthy, like taking a flaxseed oil supplement. Breastfeeding isn’t an extra special health benefit and it isn’t best, it just…is.

It seems to me that these studies are done not because they make scientific sense, or because there really is any doubt over whether artificial milk is better than the stuff we make ourselves, but because many women want justification for why breastfeeding is considered better than the choice they made: better than their mother’s choice, and their friends. They are angry at the “breastfeeding lobby” (often called “boob Nazis”) for making them feel guilty; telling them (by promoting breastfeeding as normal) that what they’ve done is selfish, or unnatural, or even harmful. Even if those words are never spoken, the inference is there to these women. But why is it there? Why is all this anger directed at those who uphold breastfeeding as the normal way to feed a baby, and fight for their right to do so while out in public and holding down jobs? Why are their suggestions on better positioning or latch, or firsthand knowledge of how to treat mastitis, or an explanation of the supply-and-demand process of milk production automatically treated as judgmental and pushy?

I know that some breastfeeding advocates are indeed judgmental and pushy in their approach, but did it never occur to anyone that perhaps breastfeeding women can be just as insecure and defensive as those who use formula? That maybe someone’s dismissal of breastfeeding is as hurtful as the dismissal of those who use bottles, for whatever reason? I’m not trying to get into the Opression Olympics here but put yourself in their (my) shoes: try hearing one of your most treasured relationships called “showing off,” or your breasts called “udders” in a derogatory way, or have your modesty, decency and even mental health challenged by those who think it’s “disgusting” and “weird.” Try listening to your baby cry in hunger as you desperately search for somewhere inoffensive to feed her, out of the way of disapproving or uncomfortable stares. Try hearing the very same health care providers, lactation consultants and friends (both ‘real’ and online) who helped you in one of your most difficult times, as a new mother struggling to learn how to relate to and care for your baby, compared to a murderous, fascist regime. Try being thrown out of a shop or ordered off an airplane for feeding your child. Then tell me you can’t understand why some breastfeeding advocates can get a bit testy when we’re told to shut up and stop making everyone ELSE feel bad.

Regardless of who suffers what wrongs, that doesn’t stop there being bad feelings and a deep mistrust on both sides. Women who breastfed with ease can be ignorant of and insensitive to the struggles other mothers face in their efforts to nurse their babies in the early days and weeks. They could do with some tact and understanding. Similarly, some of those who tried and “failed” at breastfeeding direct their feelings of anger, sadness and doubt at the ones who succeeded, taking that ‘victory’ as an insult to their loss. The thing is, that anger is often misplaced. Where is the anger at the culture that sets us up to fail, telling us our bodies are broken or not under our control and instead are more useful as men’s playthings and advertisers’ moneymakers? Where is the anger at a maternity care system that forces interventions on birthing women that later interfere with or impede breastfeeding initiation? Where is the outrage that most nurses, midwives and even pediatricians are not required to learn about breastfeeding in their medical training, or keep up-to-date with it once certified? Where is the disbelief that so many myths and misinformation are floating around out there that one has to actively and independently seek out help from specially trained consultants to get proper, evidence-based advice? It’s not just having the right health care provider and support network, but knowing that these services exist and where to find them.

Many women who were able to overcome problems simply lucked out in stumbling across an acquaintance or website that held the answers they needed. I know that if it hadn’t been for a member of an online forum I belonged to (not related to parenting) at the time of my daughter’s birth who suggested the kellymom and La Leche League sites and an NCT peer support network, I would’ve believed the midwife who squeezed my breast and said I didn’t have any milk and ordered me to supplement or risk hospitalizing my baby. I wouldn’t have seen the connection between my low supply problems and the formula top-ups I was giving TNC and been able to stop mixed feeding and get her onto breastmilk exclusively. I wouldn’t have ever figured out that I was nursing too infrequently and in the wrong position and that that was causing my many bouts of mastitis and sore nipples, not my body’s lack of ability or my baby’s over-active hunger.

It’s just such a damn shame that we can’t help each other out anymore without being deemed up in other people’s business for totally selfish and horrible reasons. Since when did sharing information with our female brethren on an experience we share (motherhood — and more specifically, newborn care) become a hostile act of aggression instead of helpful advice?

I’ll tell you when. It was when motherhood went public, got itself a PR agent and started doing two shows each day: the daytime show, performed for the audience watching intently with critics’ pens poised, and one at night, put on only for ourselves and our familes. The daytime show that feels like a yoke, a drain, a straighjacket of expectations that restricts our true potential. The late show, though — what a joy! Standing alone with only the adoring faces of our hearts’ loves shining up at us, we shed our masks, our stage makeup and our wigs. We leave our designated marks and ignore the director’s calls. We move freely and lightly, saying and doing what comes naturally instead of what’s printed on the script. We embrace motherhood as the art it should be, not the duty-bound chore it’s become.

Each night, when the curtain closes, we prepare ourselves for a new day and the critics’ reviews. We doubt ourselves and start listening to what the “experts” think instead of what makes sense to us, what comes instinctually. We see the other actors on stage, each honing her craft individually, and start to question whether our way is the best way or if we’re doing it all wrong. Instead of recognizing that each person will have a different way of going about putting on their play, we start to withdraw into ourselves and put distance between our spots on the stage. We get paranoid, thinking everyone else is watching and mocking and taking note of every mistake, every flubbed line or missed cue. We grow weary of this and get defensive whenever another actor sees us struggling and offers a hand or shares what method works for her. We insist that our method is best and that no other could possibly compare, and look for studies and research to prove it. We stop smiling at the other actors and retreat further backstage, deciding to go it alone lest any more criticism breaks our spirit completely.

This is the nature of mothering in public — always on display, always on a script, always up for review. And so breastfeeding, because it has such a strong association with what it means to be a mother (providing for and nurturing our babies), is a very emotionally charged subject. Sometimes I stop and think “How can something so supposedly simple be so darn complicated?” Because in this day and age, it really isn’t easy to breastfeed. The demands of work, partnership, romance, family, keeping home, looking good, being fit, accumulating wealth and success…they are the demands that we have grown up with and that we have to deal with constantly, in direct conflict with many of our biological, emotional and psychological desires.

Breastfeeding has been going on for centuries upon centuries but it’s never been as difficult as it is today. There is a lot of work to be done to normalize it again, to make it accessible and achievable for nearly all women again. But touting it as ‘best’ isn’t doing women any favours. We’re all trying our best just to be good enough. Holding up breastfeeding as something so special and perfect makes it seem unattainable to most women. In our efforts to reach and encourage these women, we’ve put breastfeeding on a pedestal that makes it an easy target for stone-throwing. The British public loves nothing more than taking someone or something down a peg or two when it gets too big for its britches. They don’t like any trace of smugness or being told that something they’ve done isn’t good enough or even not ‘best.’

So my response to these articles claiming that breast really isn’t best? No, of course it’s not. It’s just normal.

[h/t to The Brinkster]

Relight my fire

NS July 20th, 2009

Wow, things have been really lean here for quite awhile, eh? I really thought I’d have blogged more in the 10 days since I’ve been back but my sister only left yesterday and today, being Monday, is…well, Monday. Mondays require list-making, bank-balance-checking, food shopping, outing planning, cleaning, and frantically flipping through the untouched vestiges of the Sunday papers that I haven’t gotten round to reading yet. I have so many things I want to blog about — so many big, important, thoughtful things — and yet I keep delaying and procrastinating and finding other things to do. I’m searching for my blogging mojo and struggling to crank some life back into it. It will come, I know, I just need one good, long, uninterrupted stretch of time and enough of a fire under my ass to get things cooking again. Hopefully that will happen tomorrow, or the next day.

In the meantime, I impart these two nuggets of information to you:

  • Right after I posted about my infuriating, rude and disgusting neighbours, we found out that they are moving at the end of the month. Hip-hip-hoo-bloody-ray! Honestly, you don’t know how insanely happy this makes me, and TNH. The stress and tension I usually experience every day as I scoop their dogs’ crap off our drive, pick their strewn garbage up from around my car’s tires and listen to them scream 900 variations of FUCK YOU at each other all day long has just melted away as I envisage the moving truck pulling away with their skanky asses aboard, gone from my life forever.
  • At first glance, I thought this article on cosmetic surgery for toes was a spoof from The Onion. Sadly, it’s not. Here’s an excerpt:

    One might say that a high-heeled, pointy-toed shoe and a high-arched, naturally pointy foot are soul mates, a match made in heaven. But for women who long to slip into a spiky pair of Manolo Blahniks or Jimmy Choos but whose feet aren’t so accommodating, such a match can be made in the podiatrist’s office.

    This is where Dr. Marlene Reid, a podiatric surgeon, and her philosophy of feet and high heels come in. She knows that years after the hit television show “Sex and the City” raised high-end footwear to near-religious status, the truly fanatical have taken highly controversial steps to wear heels — including enduring procedures to lop a little or a lot off the top of a toe.

    Reid said she would never, say, amputate a toe to make it easier for someone to sport a pair of stilettos. It’s a rare surgery that has been denounced by the American Podiatric Medical Association.

    But Reid, a member of the APMA and an expert in heel and tendon pain, said women should be able to wear the latest high-heeled fashions if they want. To that end, she said she has shortened toes.

    …A large portion of Reid’s Naperville practice (which she shares with her husband, who’s also a podiatric surgeon) involves patients with heel problems. But over the years, she has seen her share of women who yearn to wear high heels as extravagant as the ones in the paintings that adorn her office walls.

    She said many of her female patients are self-conscious about their feet. “For some women, going to the podiatrist’s office is as big a deal as going to the gynecologist’s office,” she said. “We place such a premium on beautiful feet and beautiful shoes.”

    And the pressure to bare those toes is ever increasing. It’s more common these days to see women with open-toed shoes in the office. Even young girls are getting pedicures far earlier than ever.

    Reid said it’s important for patients to know the risks attendant to any surgical procedure. They also have to understand the possible outcomes, and that some procedures may require lengthy recovery times.

    “But as a woman, I don’t feel I should tell my patients they can’t wear stylish shoes,” she said. “I’ll educate them and give them advice on wearing custom orthotics or a pointy shoe with an elongated toe box. Or I’ll tell them to take a few minutes out of the day to stretch their calves or tendons. But my job is — within reason — to try to make it possible.”

    Is that the most screwed up, patriarchy-upholding thing you’ve read in a while, or what? “Hey, women need these toe surgeries because they need to fit into foot-deforming high heels to conform to ridiculous beauty standards at the cost of their health and self worth. Let’s give them a hand in this noble endeavour!” /sarcasm

  • Seriously, that makes my head hurt. I need to go to bed now and dream of puppies and comfortable shoes. G’night!

    Next »