Getting his panties in a bunch
NS January 21st, 2008
Much to his embarrassment (or amusement, who knows), famous BBC political commentator and host of Newsnight, Jeremy Paxman, has become the source of much giggling today, and sparked a strange debate that I daresay could only be considered newsworthy on this wet and whimsical island.
What’s gotten Paxy, the man with a reputation for asking tough questions of the most powerful people in politics, so worked up? Pants. Literally, pants (underwear). Oh, and socks.
The chief executive of Marks and Spencer is to meet Newsnight’s Jeremy Paxman, who has expressed concern about the quality of the chain’s underwear.
“Their pants no longer provide adequate support,” he was quoted as saying after an e-mail to the company was leaked.
Socks were “wearing out much more quickly” than before, the star added.
Jesus, Mary and Joseph! Alert the press and christen all babies — society is going to hell in a non-supportive and shoddily made handbasket! If this isn’t news, I don’t know what is. Paxman went on to say the following after the leaked e-mail went public:
“I’ve noticed that something very troubling has happened,” he told the newspaper.
“There’s no other way to put this. Their pants no longer provide adequate support.
“The other thing is socks. Even among those of us who clip our toenails very rigorously, they appear to be wearing out much more quickly on the big toe.”
I’m so tickled by this statement that I don’t even know where to begin. After I’ve finished mopping up the tea I spit all over my computer screen, I suppose I’ll go sentence by sentence. Just going to get the napkins…..okay, there. Crisis averted.
So, first we have “I’ve noticed that something very troubling has happened.” At this point I would like to remind you that he is indeed talking about underwear — pants, undergarments, Y-fronts, tighty whiteys, briefs, banana hammocks, schlong slings, what have you. And that he has grilled and politically killed the likes of Michael Howard (former Conservative leader), Tony Blair and George Gallaway (controversial London MP). He also hosts University Challenge, a deathly dull tv quiz show in which teams of geeky spec-pushing Trekkie fans (aka ‘really smart students’) furrow their pimpled brows, adjust their pocket protectors and recite answers with the enthusiasm and charm of an autopsy. So for him to be gravely concerned about the state of the nation’s underwear means something, surely.
Second statement: “There’s no other way to put this. Their pants no longer provide adequate support.” Now, as a veteran journalist, Paxman is obviously making a rookie mistake here. He has taken an observation and without looking at all possible causes and interviewing various sources to obtain differing viewpoints, has put forth an opinion as fact. Objectivity, obschmectivity. Did Paxy, age 58, ever stop to think that as he moves into the latter stage of life things just might not be (ahem) as firm as they once were? Which came first, the saggy underwear or the saggy balls? It’s like the chicken or the egg debate. A timeless classic.
Now really showing his age, he went on to say: “The other thing is socks. Even among those of us who clip our toenails very rigorously, they appear to be wearing out much more quickly on the big toe.” Wait. There is such a thing as rigorous toenail clipping? Damn it, I’ve been doing it wrong all these years! There was me, not realising it was a competitive sport, only lazily and intermittently trying to keep my toenails from reaching talon proportions. For shame.
Jeremy Paxman — once a tough-as-nails political journo; now, a poster boy for geriatric senility and the Middle Age Droop. I know that the Brits love their M&S (it’s almost as much an institution as the royal family) and would rather wear loin cloths and revert to savagedom than not have their cotton-poly mix Marks and Sparks panties, but this just might be taking things a bit far.
**Many thanks to TNH for pointing out this article and suggesting it as blog fodderÂ

